Hierarchical Knowledge Bases and Efficient Disjunctive Reasoning
نویسندگان
چکیده
We combine ideas from relation-based data management with class hierarchies to obtain Hierarchical Knowledge Bases, which have greater expressive power while maintaining the beneets of predictable and eecient information processing. We then consider the problem of reasoning with certain limited forms of disjunctive information. We show that hierarchical knowledge bases can be used for eecient approximate reasoning with such information. The signiicant features of our approach include a well-conditioned trade between ee-ciency and accuracy, with a sound and complete limit case, and approximations guided by the structure of the domain theory. Because of the structure imposed on the knowledge base, it is possible to characterize the potential error in any approximation.
منابع مشابه
Uncertainty analysis of hierarchical granular structures for multi-granulation typical hesitant fuzzy approximation space
Hierarchical structures and uncertainty measures are two main aspects in granular computing, approximate reasoning and cognitive process. Typical hesitant fuzzy sets, as a prime extension of fuzzy sets, are more flexible to reflect the hesitance and ambiguity in knowledge representation and decision making. In this paper, we mainly investigate the hierarchical structures and uncertainty measure...
متن کاملTractable First-Order Golog with Disjunctive Knowledge Bases
While based on the Situation Calculus, current implementations of the agent control language Golog typically avoid offering full first-order capabilities, but rather resort to the closed-world assumption for the sake of efficiency. On the other hand, realistic applications need to deal with incomplete world knowledge including disjunctive information. Recently Liu, Lakemeyer and Levesque propos...
متن کاملComparing Answer Set Programming and Hierarchical Knowledge Bases Regarding Comprehensibility and Reasoning Efficiency in the Context of Agents
In this paper, answer set programming and hierarchical knowledge bases are compared as knowledge representation paradigms for representing agent behavior. The comparison is based on two evaluation criteria: (1) comprehensibility (i. e., how easily the represented agent behavior can be comprehended by humans) and (2) reasoning efficiency (i. e., which of the two paradigms allows agents for more ...
متن کاملWP1: Ontology reasoning and querying D1.4 Mechanisms and Algorithms for Scalable Hybrid Reasoning
for dissemination) This document provides details required to realize the framework for hybrid reasoning presented in D1.3. In particular, it presents the algorithm for reducing OWL-DL knowledge bases to disjunctive datalog programs. As explained in D1.3, this reduction provides the foundation for interoperability among a great number of formalisms, including, but not limiting to WSML, F-Logic,...
متن کاملOo-line Reasoning for On-line Eeciency: Knowledge Bases
The complexity of reasoning is a fundamental issue in AI. In many cases, the fact that an intelligent system needs to perform reasoning on-line contributes to the diiculty of this reasoning. This paper considers the case in which an intelligent system computes whether a query is entailed by the system's knowledge base. It investigates how an initial phase of oo-line preprocessing and design can...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1989